Epstein's Ghost Emails: How Dems Used Virginia Giuffre to Smear Trump While Brennan Faces Grand Jury

00:00
Good Thursday morning, Patriots, and welcome back to O'Connor's Right Stand. I'm your host, John O'Connor, software programmer by day, conservative truth seeker by night. Yesterday was a textbook case of Democrat desperation. And I mean desperation. House Democrats decided to resurrect Jeffrey Epstein's corpse, figuratively speaking, and wave around three cherry-picked emails trying to smear President Trump. Now, I know what you're thinking.

00:30
John, didn't we already do this dance? Didn't the Epstein thing get investigated to death? Yes, yes it did. But see, Democrats are in panic mode right now, and when they panic, they pull out the old playbook. The Russia hoax didn't work. Try Epstein again, maybe this time it'll stick. Spoiler alert, it won't, and I'm going to tell you exactly why. But here's what makes this really interesting.

00:59
the timing. Because six days ago, John Brennan, remember that name, got hit with federal grand jury subpoenas. The walls are closing in on the architects of the Russian collusion hoax. And suddenly, magically, Democrats decide it's time to leak some Epstein emails. Come on, they're not even trying to hide it anymore. So today, we're going to walk through what Democrats released.

01:26
how the White House absolutely destroyed their narrative within hours, and most importantly, what they're really trying to distract you from. The Brennan story. That's the one they don't want you paying attention to. To steal from Dan Bongino, they always will tell you a story, not the story. The right stand starts now.

02:03
Alright, so yesterday morning, House Democrats on the Oversight Committee released three emails. Not hundreds, not thousands. Three emails carefully selected from 23,000 documents they got from Epstein's estate. Think about that ratio for a second. They had access to 23,000 documents and they picked exactly three to leak to CNN and MSNBC. That's not transparency.

02:33
That's a hit job. Here's what the emails actually say. And I'm going to break this down because Democrats are counting on you not understanding what you're reading. First email is from 2011. Epstein is writing to the Ghislaine Maxwell, who's currently serving 20 years in prison for sex trafficking. Epstein writes, I want you to realize that the dog that hasn't barked is Trump. Now, that phrase, dog that hasn't barked,

03:02
comes from Sherlock Holmes. It means the absence of something you'd expect to see. Epstein is basically saying, hey, Ghislaine, isn't it interesting that Trump's name hasn't come up in all the media coverage about me, even though he spent time at my house with this victim? Then Epstein claims that a victim whose name Democrats very carefully redacted spent hours at my house with him.

03:30
He's talking about Trump being at his house with this victim. And Epstein finishes with, he has never once been mentioned, meaning Trump hasn't been named in the media coverage. So Epstein is essentially bragging that Trump knew this victim, spent time around her, but somehow Trump's name has stayed out of the scandal. Second email is from January 2019, sent to author Michael Wolff. In this one,

03:59
Epstein writes, of course he knew about the girls as he asked Jelaine to stop. This is Epstein's version of why Trump kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago claiming Trump knew about the girls and asked Maxwell to stop recruiting them. The third email is from December 2015 in which Michael Wolf warns Epstein that CNN might ask Trump about their relationship during a Republican primary debate. Democrats

04:28
leaked these emails and immediately CNN and MSNBC went into overdrive. Trump spent hours with Epstein's victim. Trump knew about the girls. The implication is crystal clear. They want you to think Trump was involved in Epstein's crimes. But here's the problem. And this is where their whole scheme falls apart. They redacted that victim's name. Why would they do that? Why hide who the victim was? Well,

04:58
The White House is about to tell you exactly why. Within hours of these emails dropping, Caroline Levitt, White House press secretary, came out with a statement that absolutely eviscerated the Democrats' narrative. She revealed that the redacted victim's name is Virginia Joufray. Now, if you followed the Epstein case at all, you know that name. Virginia Joufray was one of Epstein's most prominent accusers. She was instrumental in bringing down Ghislaine Maxwell.

05:28
She fought for justice for years and tragically, she died by suicide back in April. Here's what Democrats were praying you wouldn't find out. Virginia Joufray never accused Donald Trump of anything, not once, not ever. In fact, and this is even better, her memoir just came out three weeks ago, published posthumously. It's called Nobody's Girl. And in that book, she talks about meeting Trump at Mar-a-Lago

05:57
when she worked there. You know what she said about him? Trump couldn't have been friendlier. She wrote that he asked if she liked kids, mentioned he had friends who might need babysitting, and was genuinely kind to her. That doesn't sound like someone involved in abuse, does it? That sounds like a guy being nice to a young employee. So, Levitt's statement just demolished them.

06:25
The unnamed victim referenced in these emails is the late Virginia Dufray, who repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and couldn't have been friendlier to her in the limited interactions. Then she dropped this bomb. The fact remains that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club decades ago for being a creep to his female employees, including Dufray.

06:53
Now do you see why Democrats redacted her name? They knew if people could look up Virginia Jouffre, they'd immediately find out that she cleared Trump. They knew her memoir had just been released, stating that Trump was friendly to her. They knew she never accused him of anything. So they hid her name, leaked Epstein's claims about Trump, and hoped nobody would connect the dots. That's not an investigation. That's slander.

07:23
But Republicans didn't just respond with words, no. They responded with 20,000 pages of documents. House Republicans on the Oversight Committee released their own statement that basically said, you wanna play games? Let's play. They pointed out something crucial. When Epstein's estate gave these documents to the committee, Virginia Dufresne's name wasn't redacted. The estate didn't hide it.

07:48
Democrats made a conscious decision to redact her name when they leaked it to the media. Why? Because if they left her name in there, anyone could Google her and immediately find out she'd cleared Trump. Can't have that mess up a narrative, Republican's statement was brutal. Democrats continue to carelessly cherry-pick documents to generate clickbait that is not grounded in the facts. It's because this victim, Virginia Joufray,

08:17
publicly said that she had never witnessed wrongdoing by President Trump. Democrats are trying to create a fake narrative to slander President Trump. Then, they dump 20,000 pages of Epstein documents, all of them. No cherry picking, no selective redactions for political convenience. That's what actual transparency looks like. President Trump didn't waste any time either. He went straight to truth social and called this exactly what it is.

08:47
distraction. The Democrats are trying to bring up the Jeffrey Epstein hoax again, because they'll do anything at all to deflect on how badly they've done on the shutdown and so many other subjects. Well, he's right. The government shutdown just ended. It lasted roughly 40 days. Democrats got absolutely crushed politically. They cost this country 1.5 trillion and put countless Americans at risk.

09:15
They need to change the subject fast. Trump continued, only a very bad or stupid Republican would fall into that trap. The Democrats cost our country $1.5 trillion with their recent antics. There should be no deflections to Epstein or anything else. He sees the game, and patriots, so should you. Now, let's talk about timing, because to me, this is where it gets really interesting.

09:45
These emails dropped yesterday, the same day that Representative-elect Adlita Grajava got sworn in. Why does that matter? Because their swearing-in gave Democrats the 218th signature they needed on a discharge petition to force a vote on releasing all the Epstein files from the DOJ. Democrats have been pushing for this vote for months. So they finally get the votes. And what do they do?

10:13
released three cherry-picked emails the same morning. If you actually wanted transparency, wouldn't you wait for the full release? Or wouldn't you release everything you already have instead of three emails out of 23,000? No, this was about shaping the narrative before the full truth comes out. This was about getting CNN and MSNBC to run with Trump and Epstein headlines before Americans could see the complete picture.

10:43
Multiple Democrat sources admit to reporters that the timing of Grohava's swearing in was partially why they released these emails yesterday morning. They are not even hiding it anymore.

10:58
Now we get to what Democrats are really trying to distract you from. And this is the big one. Last Thursday, six days ago, a federal grand jury issued subpoenas to John Brennan, Peter Struck, and Lisa Page. If those names sound familiar, they should. These are the people who pushed the Russian collusion hoax. These are the people who used the Steele dossier to spy on Trump's campaign.

11:25
These are the people who tried to destroy Trump's presidency with fabricated evidence. And now, they're facing a grand jury. Three weeks ago, Jim Jordan, House Judiciary Chairman, referred John Brennan to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. The charge? Lying to Congress under oath. Here's what Brennan said when he testified in May 2023. The CIA was not involved at all with the Steele dossier.

11:56
He claimed the CIA was very much opposed to including it in the Intelligence Community Assessment. That was a lie, and we now have declassified documents that prove it. The evidence shows a CIA officer drafted the dossier summary. Brennan himself decided to include it in the assessment, and Brennan overruled senior CIA officers who objected to using it. So when Brennan testified,

12:24
testified the CIA opposed it and wasn't involved. Complete fabrication. Perjury. But wait, it gets better. Less than two weeks ago on November 1st, there's video of Brennan absolutely losing his mind when confronted about his lies. Conservative consultant Thomas Spezial was at a conference at George Mason University. Brennan was speaking.

12:50
and Special asked him about signing that letter from 51 intelligence officers claiming Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation. Brennan completely lost it, got in the guy's face, started shouting, refused to answer. The moderator had to intervene, they just kept saying, next, next, next, next, to shut it down. This is the former CIA director. This is a man who testified under oath before Congress.

13:19
And when someone asks him a simple question about his own actions, he can't even keep his composure? That video went viral for a reason. It shows you everything you need to know about John Brennan's credibility. And I'll add, if you watch that video, from the moment he is asked and the question starts coming out, you can see Brennan getting nervous. Just look at his posturing. So, let's connect these dots.

13:49
Six days ago, Brennan got grand jury subpoenas. Three weeks ago, Jordan referred him for criminal prosecution. Less than two weeks ago, video Brennan melting down goes viral. Yesterday, Democrats suddenly resurrected Epstein with cherry-picked emails. You see what's happening. The walls are closing in on the people who fabricated the Russia hoax. Americans are about to learn the full truth about how Obama administration officials

14:17
lied to undermine a duly elected president. So Democrats need a distraction. They need something, anything to get Trump's name in a negative headline. And what do they reach for? Dead Jeffrey Epstein and some vague emails about a victim who explicitly cleared Trump. It's the same playbook they always use. When they are about to get caught, they accuse Trump of whatever they guilty of.

14:45
When their scandals are about to explode, they manufacture a Trump scandal. And here's what really gets me. Democrats controlled the White House for four years under Biden. Four years. They had the FBI. They had the DOJ. They had every investigative resource imaginable. If there was anything connecting Trump to Epstein's crimes, don't you think they would have found it? Don't you think that they would have indicted him?

15:15
Don't you think we would have seen charges? But we didn't, because there's probably nothing there. Trump's been investigated more than any president in history. Russia hoax, two impeachments, January 6th, Mar-a-Lago raid, classified documents, multiple district attorneys in multiple jurisdictions are going after him. If Democrats had anything on the Epstein front, it would have come out years ago.

15:44
The fact that they are now reduced to leaking decade-old emails from a dead sex trafficker making vague claims about someone who cleared Trump should tell you how desperate they are. So here's what you need to understand, patriots. Democrats are terrified. They are terrified the Brennan investigation is going to expose the Russia hoax. They are terrified the full Epstein files are going to show their own people's names.

16:12
and they are terrified that Trump is back in office with a mandate and a plan. So they are doing what they always do, lying, smearing, and hoping the media carries their water. But we see through it. Virginia Joufray cleared Trump. She said he was friendly to her. She never accused him of anything. And Democrats knew all of this when they redacted her name and leaked those emails. That's not seeking the truth.

16:41
That's political assassination. Meanwhile, John Brennan is about to testify before a grand jury about lying to Congress. Peter Stroke and Lisa Page are getting subpoenaed. The architects of the Russia hoax are finally facing consequences. That's the real story. That's what Democrats don't want you focused on. So don't give them what they want. Keep your eyes on Brennan. Watch what happens with those grand jury proceedings.

17:09
pay attention when the full Epstein files get released, because that's where the truth is. Well, find me at O'Connor's Right Stand dot com and follow me on X at O'Connor podcasts. Deep Dives every Tuesday and Thursday, Quick Strike podcasts every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Until next time, patriots, stay strong, stay informed, and stay unapologetically American. This is John O'Connor, signing off.